Costa Rican vs Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Tlingit-Haida
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Tlingit-Haida
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 28.9% |
| Range | 29.8% | 26.3% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 11.7% |
| Median | 9.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Tlingit-Haida by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |