Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,142,105 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 3.1%.

In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.51%).