Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Latin America Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Latin America
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Latin America
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Latin America Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,920,338 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 2.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Latin America |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 9.8% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 70.2% |
| Range | 34.7% | 60.4% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 16.7% |
| Median | 15.3% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latin America by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Inupiat (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Yaqui (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.26%), West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belize (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 15.1% |