Chickasaw vs Guyanese Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Guyanese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Guyanese
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Guyanese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,811,902 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Guyanese |
Minimum | 0.99% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 26.8% |
Range | 34.7% | 22.9% |
Mean | 16.2% | 13.1% |
Median | 15.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 16.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Guyanese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Jamaica (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Jamaican (14.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |