Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chickasaw
$39,163
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,401 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.530 and weighted average of $39,163. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 7.4%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $11,811 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $61,991 | $42,047 |
| Range | $50,180 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $31,098 | $28,009 |
| Median | $31,460 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $21,337 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $38,931 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $17,594 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $11,398 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $11,320 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Malaysian ($39,194, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese ($39,108, a difference of 0.14%), Iroquois ($39,104, a difference of 0.15%), Jamaican ($39,231, a difference of 0.17%), and Belizean ($39,097, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Osage | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic $39,568 |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic $39,558 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic $39,529 |
| Hawaiians | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic $39,403 |
| Nicaraguans | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic $39,372 |
| Jamaicans | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic $39,231 |
| Malaysians | 0.7 /100 | #259 | Tragic $39,194 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.6 /100 | #260 | Tragic $39,163 |
| Marshallese | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic $39,108 |
| Iroquois | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic $39,104 |
| Belizeans | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic $39,097 |
| Americans | 0.6 /100 | #264 | Tragic $39,039 |
| Spanish Americans | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic $39,012 |
| Salvadorans | 0.5 /100 | #266 | Tragic $38,858 |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic $38,848 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |