Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
$49,627
PER CAPITA INCOME
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,438,412 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of $49,627. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 36.1%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $6,333 | $10,758 |
Maximum | $125,688 | $42,047 |
Range | $119,355 | $31,289 |
Mean | $51,000 | $28,009 |
Median | $48,720 | $27,826 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $36,471 | $24,362 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $56,811 | $31,977 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $20,340 | $7,616 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $21,495 | $5,659 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $21,336 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Maltese ($49,640, a difference of 0.030%), Bolivian ($49,526, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Asia ($49,741, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Bulgaria ($49,482, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Romania ($49,463, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
South Africans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional $50,044 |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional $49,983 |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional $49,741 |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional $49,640 |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional $49,627 |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional $49,526 |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional $49,482 |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional $49,463 |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional $49,412 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional $49,316 |
Greeks | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional $49,309 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |