Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chickasaw
14.9%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,820,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.8% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 50.7% | 56.8% |
Range | 44.9% | 50.1% |
Mean | 20.7% | 22.9% |
Median | 18.5% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.7% | 24.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Yuman (14.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |