Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Households
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Bangladesh
64.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
24.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,192,017 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 64.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,582,618 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.32%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Minimum | 45.5% | 45.5% |
Maximum | 92.9% | 90.8% |
Range | 47.3% | 45.3% |
Mean | 67.1% | 66.9% |
Median | 65.0% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.7% | 62.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.6% | 71.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Bangladesh by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Arab (64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (64.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), French (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |