Norwegian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Households
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Bangladesh
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,913,401 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,582,618 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Minimum | 33.3% | 45.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 90.8% |
Range | 66.7% | 45.3% |
Mean | 66.0% | 66.9% |
Median | 64.2% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.1% | 62.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 71.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Bangladesh by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |