Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Households
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Thailand
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Thailand
64.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
24.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,192,017 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 64.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,927,069 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.38%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 45.5% | 38.4% |
| Maximum | 92.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 47.3% | 61.6% |
| Mean | 67.1% | 66.2% |
| Median | 65.0% | 64.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.7% | 60.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.6% | 72.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Thailand by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Arab (64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Lithuanian (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), French (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
| Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
| Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |