Syrian vs Immigrants from Moldova Family Households
COMPARE
Syrian
Immigrants from Moldova
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Syrians
Immigrants from Moldova
64.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Immigrants from Moldova Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,181,919 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 64.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,364,803 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.16%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Immigrants from Moldova |
| Minimum | 29.0% | 36.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 83.4% |
| Range | 71.0% | 46.5% |
| Mean | 68.3% | 64.5% |
| Median | 66.9% | 64.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.8% | 61.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.2% | 68.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Immigrants from Moldova by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are German (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Lebanese (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Uruguayan (64.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |