Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Moldova Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Immigrants from Moldova
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Immigrants from Moldova
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
77.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Moldova Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,963,245 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,364,803 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Immigrants from Moldova |
Minimum | 32.6% | 36.9% |
Maximum | 91.2% | 83.4% |
Range | 58.6% | 46.5% |
Mean | 65.8% | 64.5% |
Median | 66.2% | 64.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.9% | 61.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.7% | 68.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Moldova by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are German (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Lebanese (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Uruguayan (64.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |