Burmese vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Burmese
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Burmese
Chickasaw
48.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,297,934 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 48.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 5.0%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 24.6% | 27.5% |
Maximum | 93.9% | 68.4% |
Range | 69.3% | 40.9% |
Mean | 55.6% | 48.9% |
Median | 53.2% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.0% | 45.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.7% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Welsh (48.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (49.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Croatian (48.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (48.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (48.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Welsh | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Irish | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |