Pakistani vs Chilean Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chilean
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Pakistanis
Chileans
27.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Chilean Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,080,458 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237 and weighted average of 27.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,524,763 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.74%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.7% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 66.6% | 47.6% |
Range | 64.9% | 36.9% |
Mean | 27.1% | 27.1% |
Median | 27.7% | 28.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 30.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Chileans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.13%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Spaniards | 97.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Scandinavians | 97.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Arabs | 97.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 28.0% |
South American Indians | 96.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 96.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Pakistanis | 96.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 27.9% |