Indonesian vs Chilean Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Indonesian
Chilean
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Indonesians
Chileans
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Chilean Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,603,576 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 28.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,524,763 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indonesian | Chilean |
Minimum | 12.1% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 47.7% | 47.6% |
Range | 35.6% | 36.9% |
Mean | 29.9% | 27.1% |
Median | 28.5% | 28.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.8% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.2% | 30.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians and Chileans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |