Pakistani vs Chilean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chilean
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Pakistanis
Chileans
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Chilean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,364,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,499,348 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Chilean |
Minimum | 4.3% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.2% |
Range | 95.7% | 54.6% |
Mean | 22.3% | 15.3% |
Median | 15.8% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Chileans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Basque (14.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from England (14.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Basques | 94.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |