Osage vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Malaysia
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
17.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,925,894 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 0.36%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 49.2% | 34.5% |
Maximum | 77.6% | 85.4% |
Range | 28.5% | 50.9% |
Mean | 64.8% | 62.8% |
Median | 65.7% | 64.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 59.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 68.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from Malaysia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Norwegian (63.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |