Osage vs Immigrants from Europe Family Households
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Europe
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Europe
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
6.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Europe Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,902,993 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436 and weighted average of 63.7%, a difference of 0.030%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Europe |
Minimum | 49.2% | 25.9% |
Maximum | 77.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 28.5% | 74.1% |
Mean | 64.8% | 68.1% |
Median | 65.7% | 64.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 72.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from Europe by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Africa (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |