Osage vs Croatian Family Households
COMPARE
Osage
Croatian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Osage
Croatians
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Croatian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,542,706 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.010%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Croatian |
Minimum | 49.2% | 34.4% |
Maximum | 77.6% | 84.8% |
Range | 28.5% | 50.4% |
Mean | 64.8% | 64.6% |
Median | 65.7% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 61.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 68.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Croatians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |