Portuguese vs Immigrants from Korea Family Households
COMPARE
Portuguese
Immigrants from Korea
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Portuguese
Immigrants from Korea
65.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Korea Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,986,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 65.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,966,940 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.34%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 36.8% | 35.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.2% | 64.8% |
Mean | 68.0% | 69.4% |
Median | 66.8% | 70.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.3% | 63.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.2% | 76.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Immigrants from Korea by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |