Ugandan vs Immigrants from Lebanon Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Lebanon
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Lebanon
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Lebanon Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,015,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,145,766 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Lebanon |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 8.7% |
| Range | 9.0% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Lebanon by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |