Ugandan vs Immigrants from Zaire Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Zaire
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Zaire
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Zaire Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,015,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,252,507 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.70%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Zaire |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 12.6% |
| Range | 9.0% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.68% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Zaire by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Bahamian (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |