Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Lebanon Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Immigrants from Lebanon
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Immigrants from Lebanon
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Lebanon Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,145,766 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Immigrants from Lebanon |
Minimum | 0.34% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 6.7% | 8.7% |
Range | 6.3% | 7.3% |
Mean | 2.9% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.99% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.98% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Lebanon by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |