Sri Lankan vs Tsimshian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Tsimshian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Tsimshian
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
49.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Tsimshian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,507,273 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 17.3%, a difference of 0.95%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 5.5% | 8.4% |
Maximum | 32.6% | 20.1% |
Range | 27.2% | 11.8% |
Mean | 16.8% | 15.6% |
Median | 16.6% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 17.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Tsimshian by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Northern Africa (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Laotian (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Ecuadorian (17.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Tlingit-Haida (17.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |