Sri Lankan vs French Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
French
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
French
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
90.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs French Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,507,273 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,255,575 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.63%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | French |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 54.8% |
| Range | 27.2% | 53.3% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 18.2% |
| Median | 16.6% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and French by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French are Chilean (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Aleut (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), British (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 17.0% |
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 88.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% |
| French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |