British West Indian vs Puget Sound Salish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British West Indian
Puget Sound Salish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British West Indians
Puget Sound Salish
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Puget Sound Salish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,684,150 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,152,398 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 0.24%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 1.9% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 12.1% | 34.2% |
Range | 10.2% | 29.7% |
Mean | 6.8% | 8.5% |
Median | 6.8% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Puget Sound Salish by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), African (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |