Immigrants from Yemen vs Puget Sound Salish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Puget Sound Salish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Puget Sound Salish
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Puget Sound Salish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,432,015 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,152,398 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 2.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 2.8% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 34.2% |
Range | 14.4% | 29.7% |
Mean | 8.6% | 8.5% |
Median | 8.3% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen and Puget Sound Salish by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Delaware (7.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |