British West Indian vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British West Indian
Immigrants from Chile
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British West Indians
Immigrants from Chile
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,684,150 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,629,833 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 21.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 12.1% | 23.8% |
Range | 10.2% | 21.4% |
Mean | 6.8% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), African (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |