Australian vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Australian
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Australians
Laotians
9,058
SOCIAL INDEX
88.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
32nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Australian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,722,600 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.319% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 319.2 Laotians.
Australian vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $47,041, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $59,351, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $66,306, a difference of 0.88%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $54,369, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $94,990, a difference of 1.6%).
Income Metric | Australian | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,074 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,440 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,490 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,294 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,857 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,308 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,739 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,912 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $113,533 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,891 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Poor 26.4% |
Australian vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.87%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Australian | Laotian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Australian vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.4%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Unemployment Metric | Australian | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Australian vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Australian | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.8% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.5% | Good 82.9% |
Australian vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.1%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Australian | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Australian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.6%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Australian | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Australian vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Australian | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.4% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Australian vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Australian | Laotian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.4% |