Australian vs Laotian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Laotian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Australians
Laotians
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Laotian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,142,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,855,635 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.416 and weighted average of 17.3%, a difference of 0.69%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Laotian |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 28.9% | 25.7% |
| Range | 21.7% | 21.7% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 15.5% |
| Median | 15.7% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Laotians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are American (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Tsimshian (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Shoshone (17.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (17.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
| Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
| Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |
| Shoshone | 49.2 /100 | #176 | Average 17.3% |
| Ute | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 17.3% |