Australian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Australian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Australians
Houma
9,058
SOCIAL INDEX
88.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
32nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Australian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,930,492 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 29.6 Houma.
Australian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $32,996, a difference of 57.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $72,093, a difference of 57.5%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $76,188, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $44,356, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $50,547, a difference of 24.3%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $38,949, a difference of 34.3%).
Income Metric | Australian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,074 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,440 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,490 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,294 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,857 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,308 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,739 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,912 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $113,533 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,891 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 38.7% |
Australian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 86.9%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 85.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 26.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 45.2%).
Poverty Metric | Australian | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Australian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Australian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Australian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Australian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.8% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.5% | Tragic 74.1% |
Australian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (47.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Australian | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Tragic 46.6% |
Australian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Australian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Australian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 165.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 150.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 132.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Australian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.4% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 0.96% |
Australian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 73.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.7%).
Disability Metric | Australian | Houma |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Average 11.3% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |