Immigrants from Jordan vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Zimbabwean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Zimbabweans
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,152,945 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 4.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 25.9% | 37.5% |
Range | 24.6% | 37.0% |
Mean | 6.9% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.9% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Zimbabweans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Yugoslavian (9.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Pakistani (9.0%, a difference of 0.68%), Asian (9.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and Bulgarian (9.0%, a difference of 0.90%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |