Immigrants from Jordan vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Zimbabweans
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,238,780 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 6.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 58.2% | 59.7% |
Range | 51.9% | 58.6% |
Mean | 18.6% | 18.9% |
Median | 17.8% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Paraguayan (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Albania (19.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Greek (19.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Sweden (19.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |