Hungarian vs Tlingit-Haida No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Hungarian
Tlingit-Haida
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Hungarians
Tlingit-Haida
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Tlingit-Haida No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,779,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | Tlingit-Haida |
Minimum | 0.88% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 62.3% | 90.9% |
Range | 61.5% | 90.5% |
Mean | 14.3% | 18.5% |
Median | 8.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Tlingit-Haida by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |