Hungarian vs South African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Hungarian
South African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Hungarians
South Africans
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
61.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs South African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,340,903 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 3.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | South African |
Minimum | 0.88% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 62.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.5% | 98.5% |
Mean | 14.3% | 10.5% |
Median | 8.5% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 20.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and South Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Uganda (10.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.48%), New Zealander (10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |