Pakistani vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Pakistani
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Pakistanis
Immigrants from Oceania
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,292,014 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.45%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 19.5% | 29.1% |
Range | 17.8% | 27.9% |
Mean | 5.8% | 7.9% |
Median | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |