Hungarian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Hungarian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Hungarians
Immigrants from Oceania
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 480,650,444 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 29.1% |
| Range | 10.6% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 7.9% |
| Median | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Cuban (4.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tlingit-Haida (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Osage (4.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Osage | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| German Russians | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Russians | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |