West Indian vs New Zealander Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
West Indian
New Zealander
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
West Indians
New Zealanders
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs New Zealander Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,794,442 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.325 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,591,527 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 43.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian | New Zealander |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 11.6% | 11.9% |
Range | 9.1% | 10.8% |
Mean | 6.0% | 4.4% |
Median | 5.7% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Slavic (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |