West Indian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
West Indian
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
West Indians
Luxembourgers
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,794,442 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.325 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 64.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 11.6% | 15.5% |
Range | 9.1% | 15.1% |
Mean | 6.0% | 3.7% |
Median | 5.7% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |