Uruguayan vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Uruguayans
Ute
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,695,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 34.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Ute |
Minimum | 3.0% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 56.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.8% | 90.4% |
Mean | 22.0% | 33.1% |
Median | 17.1% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.1% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 22.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |