Arab vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Arab
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Arabs
Ute
16.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
34.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,430,772 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 30.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arab | Ute |
Minimum | 3.7% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.3% | 90.4% |
Mean | 26.3% | 33.1% |
Median | 17.8% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.5% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.4% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.9% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.7% | 22.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Morocco (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uruguay (16.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 43.1 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 42.5 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 35.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.7% |
South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |