Tongan vs Macedonian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Macedonian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Macedonians
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Macedonian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,594,768 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 0.29%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Macedonian |
Minimum | 5.1% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 22.7% | 22.4% |
Range | 17.6% | 21.7% |
Mean | 11.8% | 9.2% |
Median | 11.2% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Macedonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Russian (11.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |