Tongan vs Iranian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Iranian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Iranians
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Iranian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Iranian |
Minimum | 5.1% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 22.7% | 31.0% |
Range | 17.6% | 27.5% |
Mean | 11.8% | 9.7% |
Median | 11.2% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Iranians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |