Sri Lankan vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chippewa
11.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 388,848,578 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 42.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.3% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 77.8% |
Range | 63.3% | 68.3% |
Mean | 12.4% | 26.4% |
Median | 11.1% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 30.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Singapore (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia (11.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |