Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Chippewa
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,536,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 34.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Chippewa |
Minimum | 10.2% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 71.1% | 77.8% |
Range | 60.8% | 68.3% |
Mean | 25.1% | 26.4% |
Median | 17.3% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 30.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.3% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |