South American vs Turkish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Turkish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Turks
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Turkish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,067,746 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.030%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.77% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 62.2% |
| Range | 27.1% | 58.9% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 18.2% |
| Median | 11.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Turks by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |