Immigrants from Sweden vs Turkish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sweden
Turkish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sweden
Turks
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sweden vs Turkish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,415,814 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.72%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sweden | Turkish |
Minimum | 3.3% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 62.2% |
Range | 96.7% | 58.9% |
Mean | 38.3% | 18.2% |
Median | 22.4% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.3% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 51.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.3% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden and Turks by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Mongolian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |