Scottish vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scottish
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Scottish
Chippewa
21.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,834,351 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 22.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 90.0% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 44.2% | 38.7% |
| Median | 32.2% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.7% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.2% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.6% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.5% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.3% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Barbadian (21.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (21.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Grenada (21.8%, a difference of 0.15%), English (21.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and German (21.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |