Immigrants from Canada vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Chippewa
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,621,148 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 32.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Chippewa |
Minimum | 17.0% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
Range | 83.0% | 75.7% |
Mean | 49.2% | 38.7% |
Median | 41.8% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.2% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.2% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.3% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |