Russian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Russians
Chickasaw
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
87.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,544,064 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 30.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.8% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
Range | 96.2% | 63.9% |
Mean | 25.2% | 25.6% |
Median | 14.7% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.6% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Russians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Kenya (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Serbian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Venezuelans | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 12.4% |
Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
Russians | 87.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.5% |
Romanians | 86.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 86.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |